![]() TLDR Physicists use computers for everything. If a student had an answer in a different form than my solution, I could just ask MathematicaĪnd if it returns true, I know they are analytically equivalent. As for b) have no doubt that Mathematica 6 will be a big step forward as compared with Mathematica 5.2. I had a job grading ODE and PDE homework, and I don't know what I would've done without Mathematica. Need Help With Mathematica 6 Mathematica Thread starter dukebdx12 Start date 1 dukebdx12. When comparing quality of ongoing product support. ![]() It's great that you are learning Mathematica. Maple vs Mathematica Reviewers felt that Maple meets the needs of their business better than Mathematica. I suggest, at a minimum, learning Python and LaTeX. Maple isn't really useful if you know Mathematica. I use MatLab or Python for simulation, FORTRAN if things get serious. Unlike in Maple, Mathimatica is more flexible when you wanna do programming. I always think that Mathematica is a mix between Maple and Matlab. ![]() That said, Mathematica has their own strength as well. 4 Test on Mausing Matlab 2015a (64 bit), Maple 2015 (64 bit) and Mathematica 10.02 (64 bit) Updated the test for the now released Maple 2015 (which would have been Maple 19) but the naming changed. Maple is especially helpful whenever your doing symbolic calculations. I use Mathematica for analytical work and for shenanigans. There was no noticeable change in Maple’s speed in this test between 2015 and Maple 2015.1. I thought it was better than everything else for awhile. I quickly realized it's power, and have since learned how to use about every function it has to offer. I started using it to typeset homework my sophomore year (weird I know). I use Mathematica to do everything but wipe my butt. See screenshot below.Senior undergraduate here. is mathematica the best software program to learn I found in some ways maple was easier to use and more powerful for calculus it is interesting that you. Spyder - I normally just use these libraries with a text editor and a ipython terminal session, but if you are more comfortable with an integrated environment you may look at spyder, an IDE designed in the vein of matlab/mathematica using the above libraries. Python-numpy python-scipy python-matplotlib - Core scientific python libraries Numpy provides efficient arrays for handling large amounts of data Scipy provides algorithms, eg clustering, FFT, numerical integration, linear algebra and Matplotlib provides a wide variety of plotting functions (including an interface designed for interactive use). You might also want ipython-notebook which provides a browser-based interactive session (see image below). Maple supports computations on 17 different random process types while Mathematica supports 35 types. For symbolic and numeric computations about 190 probability distributions are supported by the Mathematica while Maple supports about 50 probability distributions. ipython - a much nicer version of the standard python shell, with session saving, tab-completion, etc. Maple and Mathematica are two different software.Some helpful tips for Mathematica: at the top menu bar open 'Palettes' then click 'Basic Math Assistant', then on that palette click 'Basic Commands'. These are definitely very useful to learn (though I use Python instead of Matlab). It is not quite a replacement, since the python language is not as specialised for mathematics as matlab/mathematica syntax, but it combines a relatively good syntax for interactive mathematics with a fully-capable programming language. Mathematica and Maple are more used for analytical work. I would suggest python with appropriate libraries as a good option.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |